InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

ilovetech

01/27/24 9:16 AM

#667770 RE: StonkMaster #667766

StonkMaster - Thanks for sharing. Apparently I was under the wrong impression. I thought the final requisite amended briefs and objections were submitted on the 12th?
icon url

Truthfan

01/27/24 9:18 AM

#667771 RE: StonkMaster #667766

Thank you SM....very much appreciated
icon url

eagle8

01/27/24 9:19 AM

#667772 RE: StonkMaster #667766

Thank you Stonkmaster !

GLTU
Bullish
Bullish
icon url

Flexroy

01/27/24 11:16 AM

#667797 RE: StonkMaster #667766

Read the whole thing. And all I can say is WOW!

Posner reduced the defendants arguments to the status of a lazy copy-paste poster, the likes of which we find posing as bears on this message board.
Bullish
Bullish
icon url

attilathehunt

01/27/24 12:55 PM

#667849 RE: StonkMaster #667766

I love these statements:


1) But the R&R went even further, finding that the Complaint pled additional facts about Defendants’ spoofing activity that make the inference of scienter even stronger, including the fact that they each signed yearly certifications in accordance with FINRA rules attesting to the fact that they had sufficient policies in place to detect and prohibit manipulative trading.

2)Defendants do not cite a single spoofing case agreeing with any of their objections to this element and offer no reason why this Court should depart from all others that have considered and rejected these same arguments

3) Indeed, Defendants cite to no case (because there is none) that limits “parking” allegations in the way they suggest, and the R&R is correct that “it is not essential for a spoofing complaint to include allegations of ‘parking’ in order to survive a motion to dismiss” in the first place.

4)They also assert that the R&R failed to consider competing inferences, but what they really mean is that the R&R failed to adopt their version of the facts instead of presuming the well-pled allegations in the Complaint to be true,
icon url

attilathehunt

01/27/24 1:24 PM

#667862 RE: StonkMaster #667766

I wonder if yesterday's late buying had to do with this filing? It pays to stay on top of the filings!!


You gotta love Laura Posner!