Replies to post #55942 on QS Energy Inc (QSEP)

[zerosnoop]

Thank you As I See It for posting FACTS & exposing the lies from the SHORTER. This is why I do my own d/d & never take advice from grubs & compulsive liars who have a history of posting nonsense.

we are proud to report that the AOT works at a full voltage of 40KV, well beyond the treatment field.

[Garbo2]

Thanks AS I See It

As thorough and effective as always

[mr_sano]

“We recently achieved yet another positive result in Dr. Tao’s lab at Temple University using crude shipped to us by a prospective client for a use case in California, referred by one of our Board members. We could not be more delighted to re-establish our relationship with Temple University to further define the empirical benefits of AOT. This is simply another validation of our technology and opened the trucking side of moving and storing oil. This market is sizable, and unlike pipelines, it does not require multiple AOT units which enables us to penetrate this market quickly.”

“Another positive result” points to efficacy which is a straight up lie. The only positive results is that it didn’t burst or short to ground. Nothing further has ever been proven ever…The company itself refers to the test as a “hydrostatic test” which is preformed with water. If they did use oil it was an additional test and could be under completely different circumstances & the specifics are always left out. What was the operating pressure of said oil? if they used mineral oil or similar it’s non conductive and doesn’t have the trace compounds crude contains. The idea that a static test of a pipe somehow represents the effectiveness of an alleged phenomena that really never past the smell test, is astounding.

Keep on shilling AISI…it’s honorable work you do defending the indefensible!

[mr_sano]

“As I stated in a previous post, the AOT is designed to slow the speed of the oil considerably as it is treated. This mean that the conditions during their most recent tests (with crude oil) are much closer to conditions inside an AOT on an actual commercial pipeline than one might think.”

So Aot is now a bottle neck right after exiting a pump station’s 3500 hp turbulent outflow? I’d stop now if I was you…the only explanation must be that you are referring to the added magical property that Aot simultaneously reduces viscosity while acting as a DRA. All for mere penny’s per barrel!

[zerosum]

Once AGAIN, As I See It shows Sano the door and proves him wrong. Proving that a little common sense and paying attention is all you need to see past the BS that Sano and others continues to put out here. Bravo, As I See It.

A big thank you to As I See It for straightening out the facts (again) and shining light on one of the several liars here.

I rarely check into this board anymore, but how many times will the facts be twisted to into lies? Well it appears quite a lot. I for one am thankful there is someone with common sense, and enough interest to call out these lies.

QSEP makes it clear that the potential customer/parter has seen enough to move forward. At the end of the day, that is what's important. They are obviously satisfied in the results they saw. The test they did for them was pivotal in that both parties are ready to take things to the next level.

If you are a basher, then you don't want to believe the CEO and think he is lying. IF the CEO is not lying, then watch out above because this is going to get interesting. Obviously, I do NOT think the CEO is lying.

I am excited to see what this will be. The CEO is saying the potential agreement is larger in size than TransCanada was. Will it be a larger pipeline? A larger dollar amount? A greater number of AOT's? I don't think what we will see in January will simply be QSEP talking about some potential opportunities, although I hope we will see that also. Based on the updates, I think it will be more material.

The more interesting aspect to me is, will we be able to put numbers on it. What will a potential deal look like? How much revenue could it potentially throw off? How many units will potentially be utilized? What are the growth opportunities with this potential parter?

This will really get exciting if we can put some numbers on it and the stock will likely take off hard if that's the case.

This board matters not. All the battling back and forth is really meaningless. If you are really an investor of any size, you are not relying on a message board for your information. No basher or bull on any message board can keep QSEP from doing well or poorly, it will be in the filings, the PR's and the stock.

Years ago I came to learn that the only power any basher or anyone else has is only what you give them. Now, since QSEP is doing better and getting closer to potentially being successful (once again), they are getting louder and louder, and posting more often same as they've done in the past. Ask yourself why. Why do they appear to be getting more desperate? The obvious answer is they are afraid of being proven wrong. If QSEP is proven successful, they will be made to look like fools. And fools they shall be.

[zerosnoop]

More FACTS from a professional who knows what he is talking about. Thanks AISI for posting FACTS & exposing more of the lies told by Sano

I couldn't let this one go by. The passage you have quoted is from a July 2014 test while my post highlights a later test in Sept. of 2014. It should be emphasized that ATS ( a division of Cannon Instrument Co ) is an independent third party brought in to do the testing.

Subsequent testing by ATS in September 2014 demonstrated viscosity reductions of 8% to 23% depending on flow rates and crude oil types in transit. In its summary report, ATS concluded that i) data indicated a decrease in viscosity of crude oil flowing through the TransCanada pipeline due to AOT treatment of the crude oil; and ii) the power supply installed on our equipment would need to be increased to maximize reduction in viscosity and take full advantage of the AOT technology. While more testing is required to establish the efficacy of our AOT technology, we are encouraged by the findings of these field tests performed under commercial operating conditions. We look forward to further development and commercialization of our technology.



Let me be clear. I am disputing your claim that the SCIENCE behind the AOT can't work because of some law of nature known only to you and that crude oil is non polar. If the AOT reduces viscosity but fails as a commercial product that means the science was good but the engineering was flawed. This test proved the science and failed the engineering. The viscosity reduction proves your theories to be wrong whether or not the test as a whole was successful.


P.S. Please reread your post #55973 and tell me how you aren't saying what I said and helping to corroborate my statement.