I'd have to agree, thus far, the evidence supports your belief much more than that of others. I share in most all of what you said. The path now is to get enough good PR's to move this up around .20c pps, and bail, (most likely) based upon evidence at hand, and if you just look at it from a chart-monitoring view, this could be dead now.
Also, based upon a couple of "X" tweets by Chandra recently, he could be very well interested in more AI-tech partnerships with ENZC, or he could just be interviewing for another job involving the same.
SAGA, if it stays alive, the deal can't gel until Fall, by what I've read of the lawsuit nonsense. If they lose, they'll be prevented, at least temporarily, from moving IP over to subsidiaries that are not funded. You are right, there are legal precedents for a case here, but if that moved forward and it was won, fair odds, everyone would get back less than pennies on the dollar. Tons of investors and a company with no cash, for the most part. Charles would probably get away with a Chapter 7 bankruptcy filing and get to pay off shares at a much lower value price back. He'd survive, the plaintiffs would get stiffed, and the lawyer gets his fee.
I know a lot of friendly lawyers, none of which have this as a specialty, and they'd find it a lot of work for no return. Problem there. BUT, an SEC filing against ENZC might sure get something more positive rolling. To do that on an OTC:Pink ticker is not easy; it requires a lot of complaints going into an SEC over issues about defrauding shareholders. With all of the ENZC investors, that might not be so hard to do.
Think I'll re-read up on that option. Charles deserves that just for this SPAC and IP-transitioning maneuver.
GTLA
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
