Replies to post #665680 on NorthWest Biotherapeutics Inc (NWBO)

[beachhyena]

I think you misunderstand what is being said to you. There is no way Linda Powers would have allowed a BP to take over the technology and consign it to being a boutique type treatment instead of what she wants and that is Dendritic Cell type technology to be recognized as the new king in cancer treatment. BP has been far too reliant on chemicals which are easy to mass produce and believe me they will never give up that cash cow until it is forced onto them. Linda Powers is sticking to her guns and with the emerging EDEN technology she is very close to being able to deliver a cancer solution to the world. You need to focus on the big picture and not earning a quick buck. EDEN and DCVAX technology will be the future of Cancer treatment and you cannot put a value on that. The noose is tightening and at some point a willing partner who is willing to step in with the money will come to the fore. MAA approval is the straw that will break the camels back and we are so close to that now. IMO

[SkyLimit2022]

J-To,

LP loaned her own money to fund research into DCVax-L years ago. It sounds like you expect a small pre-commercial biotech to do everything overnight. I think you are projecting—accusing LP of having no compassion while you may be the one who values profit over healing. I ran your statement through the detector 😶 …




“The statement could be defamatory if it is false and harms the reputation of the individual referred to as "LP." Here's an analysis of its potentially defamatory nature:

1. **Accusation of Negligence and Harm**: The statement implies that LP deliberately chose a strategy (going for a "home run") that resulted in "suffering and deaths." This is a serious accusation that suggests negligence or intentional harm, which could significantly damage LP's reputation, especially if LP is in a position of responsibility or trust.

2. **False Statement of Fact**: For a statement to be defamatory, it must be false. If LP never made the statement, then the claim is factually incorrect. The key is that the harmful aspect of the statement is presented as a fact, not an opinion.

3. **Lack of Context or Evidence**: The statement lacks context or evidence to support its serious accusations. It doesn't provide details about the supposed strategy or the resulting harm, which can lead to misinterpretation and unjust damage to LP's reputation.

4. **Public Communication**: For a statement to be defamatory, it needs to be communicated to others besides the person it's about. Posting this statement on a public forum or message board meets this criterion.

However, whether a statement is legally defamatory depends on jurisdictional laws, including how they interpret and enforce defamation, and the specific circumstances of the case. Typically, the person claiming defamation (LP in this case) must prove that the statement was made publicly, is false, and caused harm to their reputation.”

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaoncology/fullarticle/2798847

https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/northwest-biotherapeutics-announces-that-a-marketing-authorization-application-has-been-submitted-to-the-uk-mhra-for-dcvax-l-for-glioblastoma-302021038.html

[biosectinvestor]

Nonsense. She is in it to get the cure to patients. She did not intentionally cause suffering for a financial payout. That’s idiocy.