InvestorsHub Logo

Whalatane

01/19/24 9:13 PM

#420517 RE: NYcardiologyMD #420516

AHA 2023 ..section 4.2.6
https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001168. level of evidence 2R I think

REDUCE-IT (Reduction of Cardiovascular Events with Icosapent Ethyl-Intervention Trial) randomized patients with established ASCVD or diabetes plus additional risk factors, triglyceride levels between 150 mg/dL and 499 mg/dL, and an LDL-C level of <100 mg/dL on background statin therapy, to either 4 g/day of icosapent ethyl (purified EPA only) or mineral oil placebo. Icosapent ethyl significantly reduced the relative risk of MACE by 25% and cardiovascular death by 20%.32 The benefit appeared driven by the increase in EPA levels and not the modest 17% reduction in triglyceride levels. RESPECT-EPA (Randomized Trial for Evaluation in Secondary Prevention Efficacy of Combination Therapy-Statin and Eicosapentaenoic Acid) was another secondary prevention trial that showed a borderline significant reduction in MACE with icosapent ethyl 1800 mg/day (10.9% versus 14.9%; P=0.055) in 2506 participants enrolled in Japan on background statin therapy. Limitations of this trial were the lack of placebo control, and it was underpowered. Contrarily, the STRENGTH (Long-Term Outcomes Study to Assess Statin Residual Risk with Epanova in High Cardiovascular Risk Patients with Hypertriglyceridemia) trial found no benefit with a 4 g/day carboxylic acid formulation of omega-3 fatty acids (EPA and DHA) compared with a corn oil placebo, and no association with harm or benefit in those at the highest achieved tertiles for EPA and DHA levels. Incident AF was more common with both icosapent ethyl and the carboxylic acid formulation of omega-3 fatty acids and has been observed in other studies of omega-3 fatty acid formulations. Several factors could explain the discrepant outcomes observed in these trials; however, the use of a mineral oil placebo in REDUCE-IT is of concern given its adverse effects on lipid and inflammatory biomarkers, suggesting mineral oil may not be an inert placebo.53 For patients with LDL-C levels between 70 mg/dL and <100 mg/dL, it is unclear whether further LDL-C lowering or adding icosapent ethyl is more effective. Patient preference and shared decision-making are recommended, and secondary causes of elevated triglyceride levels (eg, medications, diabetes, lifestyle) should be addressed before considering icosapent ethyl. Dietary supplements containing omega-3 fatty acids are not acceptable substitutes for icosapent ethyl.

Kiwi

Jasbg

01/20/24 7:01 AM

#420520 RE: NYcardiologyMD #420516