InvestorsHub Logo

BIOChecker4

01/15/24 10:10 PM

#447886 RE: bas2020 #447883

Both can be done at the same time. In fact, several things could be done at the same time.

As I said, the website is what investors, potential partners, media folks and other stakeholders look at first. When you first met your future wife, did she look and smell like she’d been wresting pigs that afternoon or did she have nice hair, makeup, and a pretty dress? If she had been muddy and smelly, would you have asked her for a second date?

As I said, updating the website would take less than 6 minutes. With 42 employees sitting around doing nothing and collecting fat paychecks, wouldn’t you think somebody could tend to the website? What about the outside IR guy, Andrew Barwicki, who is probably getting $10K a month to do nothing? He’s not involved in the supposed EMA filing. Couldn’t he do it?

There isn’t a single person or institution in authority of any kind who you trust yet you defend Missling no matter what. It’s truly a head scratcher.

Happy MLK Day and DOG bless,

Investor2014

01/16/24 5:03 AM

#447906 RE: bas2020 #447883

If Missling is in fact the only employee and all the others we've heard of are bogus, then probably Missling should concentrate on the MAA.

Let's see... update website or work on MAA package?


More likely though the person in charge of the website, along with whoever copy writes and put together presentations, are unlikely to be spending much time on completing the MAA. So perhaps, just perhaps, updating the website could be done with no impact to the rest of the biz ops.

Obviously I do understand that a paid pumper and Missling apologist must come up with a defence no matter what.