Replies to post #447838 on Anavex Life Sciences Corp (AVXL)

[xodcode]

Anavex and everyone else but the class action lawyers can now hope that approval and/or some other reason results in a share price increase making any action moot.

I don’t think we will see that peer reviewed paper until Anavex and their lawyers feel certain that the risk of litigation has hopefully subsided.

Oh, puleeeeze, stop with the legal gibberish! You are better than that. Frederik X will not be impressed with the example you are portraying.

WGT!

[plexrec]

Inv.-powerwalker was spot on correct "that the all endpoints met statement was false."-you really don't have a clue WTF you are talking about--Anavex does not make false statement--your last post really showed what a basher loser you really are. Kudo's to pw for calling you out !!!!

[Rubyred77]

At this moment, I’d take a co PR over some anonymous board poster

“Robust, Statistically Significant and Clinically Meaningful Absolute Improvement in Cognitive Function as Measured by ADAS-Cog and ADCS-ADL”

Anavex would be DONE, if that statement doesn’t hold true.

[bas2020]

What a bunch of nonsense! Your typical 👺 post.

[catdaddy]

Might be the biggest COS you’ve ever posted. And that’s among a plethora of COS posts!

[Joseph_K]

hope that approval and/or some other reason results in a share price increase making any action moot

I'm not sure a share price increase makes any action moot. I hope you're right, but wouldn't there still be legal actions available to those who bought in, or stayed in, based on the all-endpoints-met statement if (a) the statement was untrue and (b) those shareholders sold before the hoped-for share increase? I'm not saying there would be much money for those shareholders to recover, just that there would be valid lawsuits for lawyers to bring.

I know you're not a lawyer and may be unqualified to reply meaningfully.