InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

ohsaycanyousee82

01/06/24 6:34 AM

#446380 RE: Investor2014 #446379

So the science died. You had a low, but higher success probability for Rett than AD and now Rett has withered on the vine. Doc had virtually no chance for either.

So rather than moving on to the other productive assets in an extensive portfolio of pre revenue baby bios you choose to sit here singing dirges in the dark and address each and every post that is counter to the “this song is over” narrative.

I’m sure there is some lame explanation: intrigued by failed science; intrigued by poor CEO stewardship; education of people you openly mock and largely hold disdain for; enhancing your knowledge by reading Kund and Biotech’s postings; overwhelming obsessive enjoyment of sticking a finger in the eye of George, etc.

Your continued presence and need to control the board suggests that there is still money to be made here. Since you have an opinion on everything and comment on seemingly every post, tell the group if you expect a price to first hit the 3’s or the teens in its next movement history.
icon url

frrol

01/06/24 6:37 AM

#446382 RE: Investor2014 #446379

It's so obvious! Man the conspiracy runs deep!
icon url

bas2020

01/06/24 9:05 AM

#446423 RE: Investor2014 #446379

Nope... it was clearly your FUD comments about expecting "cherry picked" Rett data, that made it very clear that the short-n-distort game is still on.
Thanks for showing your 👺 hand.