InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Dead On Arrival

01/05/24 4:52 PM

#174418 RE: LOVELWLG #174414

I was introduced to LWLG thru a family member who was a MM in the stock. My first purchase was before the Gilder Conference and I believe Terry Turpin was acting on behalf of the company. Michael Queen was involved as well.That is a long time ago. Peter Smith of Taser fame brought in JM through his wife's connection to Jim and some sort of dog business or they both were involved with dog shows.Marcelli has been the one constant thru all the years. Not sure of the ties on how Z,Leonberger,Miller and others arrived on the scene. Fred has stayed with the ship but not sure if he is in the lab anymore. Miller is gone,Z is gone.

Lebby has been on board since May 1, 2017. He has changed the direction of the company.Patents galore, new lab, and now multiple new hires. His compensation is currently over 7 figures. Not sure how much time he spends at the company. Question is when does his leash get pulled. Vague answers are insufficient anymore.

Wish some BOD members would buy stock on the open market. Kind of embarrassing.
icon url

zdog

01/05/24 5:10 PM

#174419 RE: LOVELWLG #174414

I have a lot of empathy for you early investors that have held on for so long. I understand why you look at it so differently than us newer investors. Dr. Lebby is the only CEO the company has had since I have owned the stock.

All the positive items in the December 4 letter about how close they are to signing more licenses and all the interest from potential customers etc. means nothing to you, as you have evidently heard it all before, and you just don’t believe it.

Something for you to consider that is different now than many years ago is now the technology is needed. I don’t know what they were going to use the early versions of the polymer for and who they were unsuccessful marketing to, but now we all know data centers can use 3x faster, 10x less power modulators. Lightwave now has these modulators and has been developing and patenting the process to mass produce them. 20 years ago, and even 10 years ago these improved modulators were not needed.

I believe you asked in a previous post about Lightwave putting out a press release about their reliability and stability testing. I believe the better format for reporting that data exists on their website under technical presentations and white papers. If you look at the October and November presentations, you will see the information about the testing. This is something the old polymers certainly did not have, proof of long term reliability and stability. From what I understand in my time here, the photonics industry did not believe polymer were either.

I believe Dr. Lebby has moved this company from going nowhere to the beginnings of commercialization. In my time here they have steadily improved the Perkinamine, they have created foundry produced modulators, they have provided proof of reliability and stability, and protected their creations with patents. They also now have a signed customer license.

I will not only feel good for myself when the contracts prove they are going to make money, but I will feel good for all the long timers that waited it out.




icon url

zdog

01/05/24 5:34 PM

#174420 RE: LOVELWLG #174414

Something I left out of my previous post is that I also have gratitude you early investors that kept this going for so long.
icon url

Scope08

01/05/24 8:39 PM

#174430 RE: LOVELWLG #174414

I'm sure we all feel bad for you LOVE. Abused by the company for that long a time.
Let's get real. Indications are that you're a trader. Your narrative changes depending on whether you want the PPS to go up....or want the PPS to go down.
Therefore, nothing you say can be trusted.
Nothing wrong with trading stocks. However there is something wrong with portraying yourself one way, while trying to facilitate movement the other.
I'm a long. I don't trade or short LWLG. I don't believe I'm overly pumping either. Just chilling...for 11 yearsish.
I don't understand why people like you just don't admit what they do. Why don't shorts just state they're short? Why don't traders say they sold, and are now hoping for a decrease to buy some back?
You're so savvy, aren't you? Fooling us like that.
I don't believe, that in all your time here, you've ever been a well received/respected member of this board. That tells me that you goal here is not the sharing of information in a good faith manner, but to try to provide a false narrative that suits your flavor of the month.
icon url

redspinelpinktopaz

01/06/24 11:10 AM

#174441 RE: LOVELWLG #174414

Everything you say is fine on both sides of "or if we will every reach commercialization"
Not even you, believe that.