Laurent, agreed. It's possible that there was just not enough separation in 18 months to be "meaningful".
What is unfortunate, is that this does not reflect the possibility that years of EPA/IPE consumption could have a positive impact on those biomarkers and cognitive function.
I believe you are way of target here - do you have any relatives fighting the decease I wonder ? -------------------------------------------
Everything is about SLOWING the decline - in the end we all die (or most of us anyway).
It is '95% nonsense talking about' Improving Cognization for people at risk of AZ.
It ALL about saving who 'THEY WERE / ARE long as possible,
The rest is just the endless biolabs trying to make 'living' - Inventing "Drugs" - that will recover lost braincells. Not Likely to happen in the 'real world' !
No, you fail to understand what trial "results" are.
"Results" include anything after the start of the trial. In this case they include the patient demographics as presented in the abstract,. All you have to do is look at any full paper on a trial and you will see "results" have pages of information starting with patient accrual.
There is no reason to assume that any efficacy results have been presented.