Is the comparison of A2-73 to Daybue really so many times better, or is there a reverse-paydown-derivative reduction to the meaning of the difference like there always seems to be in the "Don King contract" world of biotech statistics? I am always amazed by the "up is down", "big means small", "it really changed but not really really" way the statistic work out. Though I am confident that liars figure and figures lie. (Don King contracted heavy weight boxers in such a way that the many "millionaire boxers" are all uniformly broke.)
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
