InvestorsHub Logo

jfk

12/27/23 1:47 PM

#444373 RE: falconer66a #444363

Falconer, you offer some truly interesting and ambitious hypotheses. But, I'm wondering if you are make the erroneous assumption that AVXL is aware of these opportunities/this science. Are you conveying these thoughts to the company itself....or just assuming that they are 'on the case'? I'd be shocked if anyone from AVXL is looking at investors hub for perspective/ideas for follow-up/testing, or for scientific advice. Hopefully, they are ambitiously making advances in the areas you put forward, but, not so sure.

ignatiusrielly35

12/27/23 1:54 PM

#444375 RE: falconer66a #444363

Seems to me you would need an extremely large number of pre-natal patients in such a study, to then compare the results to statistical incidence of congenital defects, no? Also, what specific birth defects would they assess?