InvestorsHub Logo

snow

12/22/23 4:00 AM

#69488 RE: stervc #69486

stervc "$600,000,000 Revenues x 20% Net Profit Margin = $120,000,000 Net Income" In my view a net profit margin of 20% on such big deals is totally out of the world. I guess a net profit margin of two percent would be quite optimistic.

shotsky

12/22/23 7:47 AM

#69502 RE: stervc #69486

The money for buying the goods is coming from a loan. The cost of shipping is coming from the loan. Once all costs are paid back, with interest, what is left is revenue. Some of that is profit. We have no idea yet how much that will be, but it certainly won't be that much. With a 5.5B OS, what would you think would be done with any profit? The COB (Cost of doing Business) takes some of the profit. Filings cost money, website designers cost money, PR's cost money, and probably a store rental. Not to mention travel and lodging.
So, loans are paid back with interest, and expenses exist. Revenue doesn't all float to the bottom line. What is left over AFTER all expenses is profit. Hopefully, JP will give us some idea of the expenses involved, as he said he would.

Huggy Bear

12/22/23 6:27 PM

#69589 RE: stervc #69486

600 million coming in here lol.

Care to comment on the 4.3 million John Park has in loan default judgments against him in 2023 alone, and his personal home being foreclosured on as well?

Why are you so deceptive by not acknowledging reality, Sterling?

garygoldbug

12/29/23 8:46 AM

#70286 RE: stervc #69486

I couldn't delete my response as it was a mistake so I just erased it. I mistakenly responded to a 12/22 post. I apologize for that. My previous post stands.
Bullish
Bullish

doogdilinger

01/03/24 11:46 AM

#70744 RE: stervc #69486

Thanks for this great post sterling! You ROCK as always and what a fantastic way to kick off 2024 choo-choo!!!

SILVERSURFER4263

01/03/24 11:50 AM

#70749 RE: stervc #69486

does $nhmd still have a @ 600 m sugar contract? 0004 might be time to buy

JPXPetra

01/04/24 10:16 AM

#71008 RE: stervc #69486

Yeah, DPLS went to .20 on a 4bn OS I think

RR67

01/04/24 10:46 AM

#71027 RE: stervc #69486

“.021 EPS x 15 PE Ratio = .315 per share for SPZI Valuation” … sounds achievable if all the pieces of the puzzle fall into place, imo

I-Glow

01/11/24 4:24 PM

#73485 RE: stervc #69486

Here is one of your pumping valuations:

"stervc
Friday, 05/28/2021 11:44:55 AM

AVVH .92 to $3.61 Valuation with Gold Quest Acquisition…"
. Read the entire valuation - https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=164091317

Here is something that proves he has zero credibility.

"Presumption ** Since GQG lends over $500M Annually, fair to expect 20% of that or over $100 Million in Revenues for what should come into AVVH."

Hey Stervc, a loan isn't revenue! And AVVH still hasn't generated any revenue.


What a load of crap - "Fundamentally, let's consider the roughly $600 Million that should be coming here at a minimum. Let's presume a basic 20% Net Profit Margin."

So your valuation is based on imaginary revenue - this is hilarious - "the roughly $600 Million that should be coming here at a minimum."


Although, the company hasn't generated any revenue in 2023. And the contracts are as fake as your valuations.

How many of your fake evaluations have I busted you on - 4 or 5. Most I don't bother because they are so ridiculous.

Remember when you were pumping AVVH and had a horrible valuation based on real estate.

Here you go to show you are a pumper who is clueless about Valuations.

IG