InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

drugrunner

12/21/23 5:37 PM

#658051 RE: exwannabe #658050

No one questions a penny stock for over 10 years without financial incentive to do so.
icon url

muee88

12/21/23 5:42 PM

#658053 RE: exwannabe #658050

You lost. Honor your bet and be gone!
icon url

Hspooner

12/21/23 5:43 PM

#658054 RE: exwannabe #658050

Hey Ex, discovery’s a bitch, Merry Christmas,LOL…LOL…LOL…. TOOL!!!
icon url

JimSmith111

12/21/23 6:03 PM

#658061 RE: exwannabe #658050

Where on the spectrum of Correct does this exchange land? In evaluating this, recall I am 1 of the 4 other replies you mentioned, suggesting my reference to Checkmate was not a proper indication that you had been wrong in the past.

Post 429032
exwannabe (I am revolted to type the username but it's what I had to do)
"Of course 548 failed.
It is just one of the endless string of trials that easily best [sic] historical comps yet failed."

Post 429172
flipper44
"Quack alert.
You have no clue if 548 beat historical controls. You’d need patient demographics and carefully matched ECA. Opdivo lost to the placebo control arm by a three month median in methylated MGMT. Here’s a hint Ex, placebo (Aka: SOC) did not beat SOC by 10 months."

For all that quacking over the years, I'd have thought you'd have a healthier appreciation for breadcrumbs.

Edit: You are in a very good position to embarrass me and show I'm wrong, because I really don't know much about this stuff. I'm largely relying on the famous nature of the lie, and that you abandoned the thread rather than respond, again.
icon url

hope4patients

12/21/23 8:16 PM

#658084 RE: exwannabe #658050

It’s because you deleted it. I saw your post, Hoffman saw it, and others saw it. We all know what you have been attempting to do here for so long. Today GBM patients won and you lost.
icon url

flipper44

12/21/23 9:43 PM

#658105 RE: exwannabe #658050

Ex, my favorite time when you were wrong was when you predicted the DCVax-l trial would never be written up in a top tier journal providing a strong conclusion stating DCVax-l treatment was statistically correlated with survival.

Oops.

I could go on, and then I could review all your posts, but why bother? You’ve claimed DCVax-l is a scam. You are clearly biased, motivated and wrong from time to time.

We all are wrong from time to time. It’s just the depth of agenda some folks have. NWBO has had a boot on its throat for years. It decided in 2015 to stop responding to every attack.

As a disinterested observer (which you are not), you should have been fascinated with developments like Dr. Bosch’s June presentation and the follow up abstract from Liau/Bosch/Ashkan.

Instead, like some politicians who always vote the party line, you always vote “scam.”

People smell that over time, even from an intelligent being who obviously misspells on purpose.
icon url

drugrunner

12/21/23 10:45 PM

#658115 RE: exwannabe #658050

You were part of the cabal that caused the company to go downhill .. yes u caused that. Proud moment for u..
icon url

dennisdave

12/22/23 3:37 AM

#658152 RE: exwannabe #658050

So basically you keep ignoring posters citing you, where you have been wrong on the major issues about NWBO such as they will never post in a scientific journal and never submit the MAA application with the MHRA. You keep claiming posters keep saying you have been wrong but dont provide examples of you being wrong yet when they do you ignore that?

You do realize what an ignorant ass you are dont you, you do know that