InvestorsHub Logo

zab

12/14/23 8:19 AM

#456638 RE: brooklyn13 #456637

https://www.jewishnews.co.uk/netanyahu-rejects-calls-for-2-state-solution-gaza-will-be-neither-hamastan-nor-fatahstan/

Netanyahu dismisses any talk of a two-state solution, so I imagine he just wants to finish wanted he has always wanted to do and just eliminate Gaza and everyone who lives there.

Once again when you have an asshole like Netanyahu as a leader the course for your country is to alienate everyone around you, and almost anyone who is trying to support you.

Now you understand why Hamas has the same views as Netanyahu.

Zorax

12/14/23 5:02 PM

#456676 RE: brooklyn13 #456637

How, exactly, does the attack by Hamas further the goal of a Palestinian statehood? And what, exactly, should Israel's response have been? Put on your big boy pants and write a reasoned response, please.

Your comment is confusing. And I don't want to get involved in this discussion but your response looks like you always ignore Palestinians and maybe hold them as low as hamas. What sicko is leading hamas because it is true even they state death to everyone.
But the question could be asked, what sicko is leading Israel?

How many hundred of hamas came over the border, or where always there and killed what? 1,200 Israelis or more? Then Netanyahu goes into Gaza, wipes out villages and miles of cities and ghettos and at least 20,000 Palestinians with large areas that hamas wasn't in... and this is a reasoned response by Netanyahu? At what point is enough? Is 100 deaths per 1 death good enough?

sortagreen

12/15/23 8:10 PM

#456789 RE: brooklyn13 #456637

I haven't seen any list of demands by Hamas, say, withdrawal from the settlements or return to '67 borders



As if Israel would give up the West Bank. Did I say something about negotiating with Hamas?

I said something about the wholesale, indiscriminate slaughter of women and children. Your responses have been basically that you just don't fucking care. Were you the one that said "war is hell"? It was you, right?

No. I really have no respect for that opinion. Put me down as calling it what it is; it's criminal.

I've already heard your opinion of what Custer did in the 1870s. You may as well drag in Charlemagne or Xerxes. It's immaterial. Behind your platitudes and rationalizations, buildings full of children are being bombed into rubble. But there's a job to be done, and it's expedient.

Do you know Adolf Eichmann never killed anyone? No, really. It's true.