Replies to post #58620 on United Western Bancorp Inc (fka UWBKQ)

[Large Green]

Remember one very important distinction.

This is the final resolve of UWBKQ bk cases NOT the FDIC Receivership resolve.

So, what we are looking for may be administered by the FDIC and continue to wait but nonetheless, a very exciting forward development


…

[iPrelude]

That's a very good question LG,

I continue to believe that we are zeroed unless some of the assets were exempt because of the wrongful seizure of the bank ( https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=172787645 ; https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=172787887 ; https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=173018879 )

As mentioned before, asset 33: ---Potential proceeds from lawsuit against OCC (u) Orig. Asset Memo:Not originally scheduled; Imported from AmendedDoc#: 331--- is IMO clearly an exempt asset, but I could be wrong

Filing 331 of the docket is referenced as the link to every known asset of unknown value, including asset 33, but (https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4194291/united-western-bancorp-inc/?order_by=desc&page=3) that document is still not available without a Pacer account + payment
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
331

May 30, 2013

Amended Schedules B. Filed by Harvey Sender on behalf of United Western Bancorp, Inc. (related document(s):103 Amended Schedules-No Fee Required). (Sender, Harvey) (Entered: 05/30/2013)

Main Doc­ument
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------