Replies to post #442240 on Anavex Life Sciences Corp (AVXL)

[BIOChecker4]

As a stockholder of Anavex or any other public company, you have the right to demand excellence from management. True, things don’t always go as planned, but repeated fumbles, stumbles, missed timelines, goal post moving, cherry picking of data, etc. are, or should be, unacceptable.

Too many stockholders of Anavex would rather blame anyone or anything other than the CEO. To admit to the facts would require an admission of being wrong about prior beliefs.

Missling is incompetent and stockholders are the victims. Some of them are even willing victims.

By the way, did anybody take Georgejjl’s advice and buy in the pre-market ahead of news today? If so, take this experience as a hard but important lesson.

Good licks and DOG bless,

[avxllent]

Boi - What About the PDD Peer Review?

It's been 3 YEARS? That's a problem. That isn't a minor thing. I want this thing to fire as much as anyone, but every day that goes by without news makes me question Missling even more. It's a pattern that has been going on for a long time. Time has run out! This is my 3rd post of the day, which is my limit, so I can't repsond to any replies.

[mrplmer]

If someone states a peer review is coming and 3 years pass, we weren't to take the commenter as serious? If something has changed shouldn't the original commenter revise their remarks? If not how can one trust any further comments he makes? And if we can't trust them why do they still have their job as HEAD commenter?

[sumbuysumsell]

Safety check?

The fact that there's been a missed Rett safety check in was a changed circumstance.

Does anyone think the 'safety check' could be a product of discussions with the FDA under a rolling submission for Rett? Could the FDA have asked for this as part of an in process Rett NDA?