If you were not paid for an opinion that incentivize you to ignore facts, it would actually be possible for you to be wiser instead of just ranting of the lies from your transcript.
You very often take Al Musellas words out of context, when you would like to manipulate us into believing, that he would choose Optune, if he was in need of a glioblastoma treatment. Everytime you just "cut of" the context, so that it supports your paid for fictional narrative.
Al Musella wrote this about Matthew Williams (Novocure affiliated) bullshit regarding the DCVax-L trial:
He also refuted the bullshit from these two (Novocure affiliated) doctors.
You could also read the JAMA Oncology journal of course peer reviewed by 73 peers, but that would go against the whole point about your financial incentive for being here at all of course.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
