InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

dstock07734

12/06/23 12:02 PM

#653701 RE: ilovetech #653693

ILT,

Thank you for the reply. Nowadays we have enormous amount of information around us. Sadly we cannot trust those information and some of these information brings damage to our personal health. That's why I never read Reuters - Fact-Check - NPR now.
icon url

biosectinvestor

12/06/23 6:59 PM

#653800 RE: ilovetech #653693

When the posts of conspiracy theorists are filled with false basic facts, yes, Reuters and similar fact checks are appropriate responses. When they claim that their source ran the Human Genome project and is a doctor but in fact he was a technician for a company that worked on the project and is not an expert at all in the subject and when there are lies like that in basically the entire argument, yeah, Reuters is perfectly fine to add as a rebut along with a full explanation for the bogus nature of the nonsense you post.
icon url

JimSmith111

12/06/23 7:29 PM

#653808 RE: ilovetech #653693

This is not attributed to any poster just thinking out loud - I cannot comprehend how one could contemplate the issues affecting this company and the "stakeholders" across many industries that are looking the other way generally to allow these things to happen, and yet find that this company presents the one and only instance where people are acting in concert (or, as part of a conspiracy) to cause harm. It's kind of a big deal that a revolutionary cancer treatment is experiencing these issues, but there will be no lasting effect accompanying this observation for most.

As an example, at one point there were a lot of...products going through Mena, Arkansas. To go further would be too off topic for here.