Replies to post #120497 on HUMBL Inc (HMBL)

[Cinnyricinclus]

Good point. There is a good chance I'll refute something that you post as being due diligence. It's too bad that you're not confident that your due diligence would stand up to any scrutiny. You're right that it's better that you don't post it.

So now that I fully understand why you won't post your due diligence, there's no point in you continuing to rehash your reasons for why you won't post your analysis, right??

On a serious note, often if you write down your analysis (even if you don't post it), that can help you to determine for yourself whether you've been over-optimistic (or under-optimistic). If you can write your Humbl bull case on paper in a clear way where it makes sense to you when you read it, maybe you do have a good analysis. If not, then maybe you don't have as strong a case as you thought.

[Cinnyricinclus]

You definitely shouldn't be afraid to post your opinions just because someone might try to refute them. I post my opinions point blank despite having NoMoDo pounce on them. E.g. I said HMBL was near the all time low and he corrected me by saying I was flat wrong because $0.001/share was multiples of $0.0004/share. I said Tickeri was a failure and he again corrected me by saying Humbl successfully captured the essence of Tickeri before letting Tickeri go, basically saying that learning the art of unprofitably selling tickets was an invaluable skill acquired by Humbl.

Debate is healthy. It helps us flesh out differences in opinion and maybe even allows us all to make better investment decisions.