InvestorsHub Logo

DRHUMI

12/04/23 9:56 AM

#191578 RE: MAGA_PATRIOT #191573

Part of the problem is that he has given us no clarity, so at this point, all we know is that we're getting screwed with the qty of SAGA div vs what we were originally led to believe we were getting. And the really F'd up part of that is that our div qty was 900/100,000 when the sale price was $250M, then it goes up to $450M and our div qty drops to 400/100,000 best case (which is really just Charles subtlety saying it will be worse)?

(The 900 / 100,000 was a fictional example)

A little bit of clarity on:

1. What happens with ENZC? Right now I'm expecting it to drop back to trip after the div, and possibly before, depending on the non-stop conversions/dilution. If it does go back to Trips, then this is truly a disguised RS, which I believe it is anyway.

(I can buy my way out then, and it will be a non stop flipper if that happens, but he secured 36 months of funding. Why?)


2. Give us a solid and accurate number for the dividend, as well as details. How long do we have to hold ENZC for to be eligible? How long will our SAGA div shares be restricted?

(Agreed)

5. What happen to Montana results? Enzo? Clone 3? Samsung? Etc....

(Everything must be rolled up under NDA's)

Anyway, dropping some accurate clarity on us would go a long way, but I genuinely believe that Charles views us commons as second-tier penny investors, who aren't worth his time. However, that's just my own personal opinion based on his actions or inaction, as well as how he pulled the bait & switch 180, then very shady-like dropped in the PR that ENZC would continue on pinks with no assets/ops; and he did this after leading us to believe that we would fully audited & SEC reporting this year.

(Can you point out a SPAC that has given it's target company investors dividends right off the bat? I can't)

Can you imagine the new company raising all the funds they need via a forward split? I can... Then dividends ongoing?

There's no reason to launch on Nasdaq at all unless some BP partners want them to.

sspalmo

12/04/23 10:44 AM

#191586 RE: MAGA_PATRIOT #191573

Point number 4, I thought that the game plan has changed. ENZC is no longer going to uplist and will not be required to be SEC reporting. SAGA now owns the subs and they will be required to follow SEC filing requirements. The audits that have been provided (2020, 2021, and 2022) should meet the requirements on ENZC's behalf for the business combination agreement. At this point all ENZC has to do is file quarterlies on time to remain "Pink Current". I don't believe that ENZC has plans to go "SEC reporting". As to the other issues you have brought up, I have no answers and will not disagree with you that shareholders should have more clarity. It's funny that 3 years after the "business combination agreement" between Enzolytics and BioClonetics that we are now in another "business combination agreement" this time with ENZC and SAGA.

ENZC FTW

12/04/23 6:35 PM

#191612 RE: MAGA_PATRIOT #191573

If you haven't read the PRs or listened to the interviews, I could suppose one could be confused on the status...which is what Josh does on the regular on Twitter and then admitted to not reading the filings or PRs which addressed the completion of the studies, have shared with Samsung and other potential partners ie Regeneron/Gilead/Etc. They then completed the efficacy testing of the recombinant mAbs that Samsung has produced with plans with animal studies as shared multiple times since end of 2022.

You and Timing keep bringing up not having audited fins...which is odd, since 2020, 2021 and 2022 have been audited.

Anyway, have a great Christmas 🎄 Holiday and GLTA.