Replies to post #169088 on Lightwave Logic Inc (LWLG)

[tedpeele]

ALL SHAREHOLDERS SHOULD READ THIS:

HOLY MOLY - this is what you just said "proves nothing". Unfortunatly too many here are ostriches like yourself.

Of course it "proves" nothing -- that's what I said: "Not proof - but very close."

You dismiss what any reasonable person would conclude is actually very close to proof since it isn't 100%...wow, just wow...

What I said earlier:with minor edits

Not proof - but very close

on June 19 - less than one month after the Lightwave commercial agreement was announced,

Jimmy/Richard LaRiv posted Polariton's new website that according to him announces their launch of commercial products: https://www.reddit.com/r/LWLG/comments/14dl9iz/polariton_launches_commercial_products/

Among those products?:

Their RRM-C110 ring modulator product which has only ONE related paper- the one discussing their use of Lightwave's Perkamine chromophores with their ring modulators.

Link to the Product with (allegedly) LWLG Inside:
https://www.polariton.ch/products/rrm-c110

Link to the ONLY related paper:
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41566-023-01161-9

The strong connection of Perkamine to RRM-C110 COMBINED WITH the VERY CLOSE time of first announcement (the first in the history of BOTH companies), is IMO nearly a LOCK for concluding that the Lightwave deal was with Polariton. Unfortunately that strengthens my case that this was not in the same league as a Foundry/Transceiver deal announcement and therefore should not have been used to avoid a review of their goals with regard to their work with the Foundries toward a final transceiver product. That is why it comes across to me as having been misleading.

..