InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Investor2014

11/25/23 5:23 PM

#440096 RE: Steady_T #440094

So in other words your favourite absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.

This of course can with ease be applied to an infinite number of situations, few of them with any merit.

I would suggest that clear communication and data from the company represents better investment due diligence than any amount of wonderful conjecture.
icon url

abew4me

11/25/23 5:38 PM

#440097 RE: Steady_T #440094

Agreed. Even Doc328 stated that some companies submit NDAs and don't notify their investors until after they've received acceptance from the FDA of their application. This is exactly what I think Anavex has done.

Let's be real here folks, Anavex has had plenty of time to prepare the TLR for the Rett Excellence trial results.

Since they haven't disclosed the results, I'm assuming that TGD has opted to submit the full data to the FDA and is waiting to hear back for our NDA acceptance. I could be wrong of course...but this is my theory.
icon url

frrol

11/25/23 6:23 PM

#440100 RE: Steady_T #440094

Try not to mix desiring with reasoning.
icon url

ExtremelyBullishZig

11/25/23 8:48 PM

#440109 RE: Steady_T #440094

Yeah...that makes sense. PR the EU one but not the FDA...

Exhibit infinity.