No, today’s PR is the fulfillment of their promise from the last PR. It is a future statement about what is naturally an iterative process so it would be normal for lawyers to ensure that it is carefully phrased to leave room. Also, some of us criticized their PR previous to the last one for being too specific. So they cannot win either way. They can say absolutes and when they miss, slightly, they get barraged and in this PR they have appropriately left a bit of normal legal language to be clear as to the process.
Honestly, the more you say, the more shorts who are determined will mess with you, which is why companies like this drop into stealth mode for years on end, and appropriately so. But the challenge then is they leave their narrative to shorts and writers like AF, who for all intents and purposes appear to serve the interests of shorts for access.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
