I think you can go back to the cheerleader’s posting history and separate fact from fiction…this wasn’t about being positive about a ticker rather it was about the continual encouragement to buy, the presentation of bogus due diligence, and the defamation toward anyone who challenged the Chinese web nonsense. Those who challenged the cheerleading were mocked and met with accusations of being crazy or not knowing how to perform due diligence. At the very least, your cheerleading ally may have been duped himself, but I have the opinion he was selling or his group was selling. He continually acted as if he had insider information, or was smarter than the next investor and privy to something no one else had with his “soon”. In my opinion you’re in denial.
Let’s face it….your investment is most likely worthless….this will soon be suspended for 10 days absent a filing. The SEC should and would as a precaution to investors….
In my opinion, the expert market is a good place for this ticker to land considering the absence of transparency from the company. No filings is seen by the SEC as potential deception to the shareholder. Would you state the SEC is being speculative without evidence when it suspends a ticker?
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
