InvestorsHub Logo

ReikoBlack

11/15/23 12:57 AM

#718940 RE: newflow #718939

Why don't you post the entire paragraph? It forms a clearer picture to what they're trying to convey. Just the same, what does it really matter? The WMI Liquidating Trust has been dissolved for nearly 2 years.

AS PROVIDED IN TREASURY DEPARTMENT CIRCULAR 230, ANY TAX ADVICE IN THIS
DOCUMENT IS NOT WRITTEN OR INTENDED TO BE USED, AND CANNOT BE USED, BY
ANY PERSON OR ENTITY FOR THE PURPOSE OF AVOIDING TAX PENALTIES THAT MAY
BE IMPOSED ON ANY TAXPAYER. THE MATERIALS IN THIS DOCUMENT IS PROVIDED
FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY AND DO NOT CONSTITUTE LEGAL ADVICE.
YOU SHOULD NOT ACT OR RELY ON ANY INFORMATION IN OR REFERENCED BY THIS
DOCUMENT WITHOUT SEEKING THE ADVICE OF A QUALIFIED PROFESSIONAL.

"YOU SHOULD NOT ACT OR RELY ON ANY INFORMATION IN" LOL.But clowns want you to rely on it 24x7???Like katekir and joe?.Especially that lodas uid and other uid used by his team specifically saying thanks for posting this?.LOLOL.
"YOU SHOULD NOT ACT OR RELY", story continues but if you need help talk to a professional.

newflow

11/15/23 1:18 AM

#718942 RE: newflow #718939

"YOU SHOULD NOT ACT OR RELY ON ANY INFORMATION IN" clear Seiko?.

lodas

11/15/23 2:09 AM

#718944 RE: newflow #718939

did you read my post #718923 that I gave to ron?.......it has a link to the 2013 WMIH 10-K........Read it before calling me a fake, because it contains important information for your escrowitus sickness....I know that you wont read it, so I will read it for you in part:

WMIIC had 7 Trusts that were liquidated to fund the WMIL-T to fund Creditor claims associated with the chapter 11.....The surviving Trust was WMMRC which held 34 Million dollars only as per the 10-K that was audited by independent accountants.... so what does this mean?

(1) it means both you, ron, and the rest of you lemmings that think that there is a non disclosed hidden Trust holding billions of dollars is a fanatic dream, concocted by dreamy eyed expectants....
(2) It means because you guys put people on ignore, and refuse to read the links provided for making the proper conclusions, have conflated the actual SEC documents to suit your ill concocted agenda that money was coming back
(3) you have called people trying to impart the truth as the documents revealed , liars, cheats, moles, and other derogatory labels, when actually the blame of failure belongs solely to your intransigence to engage in honest debate of the SEC documents........ Lodas