InvestorsHub Logo

JNdouble1

11/07/23 6:25 PM

#323814 RE: riccikeeper #323813

Hmm, that's not really an answer.

A better answer would be: existing FDA clearances might have some value.

It wouldn't be terribly difficult to achieve substantial equivalence to BIEL's products, but it would require a little time and money. I suppose that if there was any evidence of market viability, someone like Enovis might consider buying the product rather than making their own. That part about market viability is really the sticking point though, don't you think?

GetSeriousOK

11/07/23 6:57 PM

#323817 RE: riccikeeper #323813

Argumentum Ad Ignorantiam -- Isn't it more logical to deduce that a buyout is not revealed because there is no buyout?

But I'll bite. What "things" are not being revealed?

Why are they not being revealed?

Why Enovis?

What would this "bid" be? Would it be a set price per share? The Whelans and Staelin own a very small number of shares, meaning they would get little in a buyout offer of $$$ per share, so why would they accept that kind of offer? And how would shareholders benefit from any OTHER kind of buyout offer?