When you're not twisting things, you're misconstruing them. I didn't say or imply it was about me. I simply jumped in to say it's not the same as the wiper story and then, since I said that and since I wasn't gonna go thru that whole deal again, I thought I should at least add that the different conclusions I've reached were not based on the usual reasons that ppl often respond with that have nothing to do with my reasons, ie, what I listed. I said that to save anyone the trouble of bringing those same invalid reasons. For ex, they repeatedly try to make me understand that the patents are valid due to all the IPR decisions. I have always stated that the patent are valid, but not for that reason.
So again, it wasn't about me it was about me disagreeing with the so called good example......and then adding something to remind that my reasons aren't the usual ones that get debunked.
It's ok that you usually find fault... Not my fault, lol
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
