InvestorsHub Logo

fung_derf

10/23/23 3:47 PM

#125022 RE: nyt #125020

It's ALWAYS about you....but let me highlight for you so you don't misconstrue.....

I've explained all that here before.

Besides, it has no bearing whatsoever on my conclusion that there are no infringements and the patents are useless. I've explained enough times, in great detail, my basis for that conclusion. It has nothing to do with wipers or companies stalling or invalid patents or slow courts or anything along any of those lines, even tho ppl keep ascribing those reasons to me, as though I have ever used them to explain my sentiments about vplm and the value of the patents. Nothing whatsoever. My conclusions are based on well thought out inferences and dot connecting. It's the same as how we know almost everything there is to know about atoms, via inference rather than direct observation.



Dude, you are giving YOUR opinion, and doing so as if I asked you.
BTW, you didn't think I was twisting anything when I provided you the court information. But
I had to explain it to you