InvestorsHub Logo

bobroo

10/17/23 3:37 PM

#230948 RE: Researchfyi #230946

Let's extrapolate this just a bit further and make it crystal clear to even the densest rainbow riding unicorn.

This "innovation" has been around for some 20 years. There have been marketed products of knives, USB drives, golf clubs, Nokia phones, guitar pegs, Turing phones, tennis rackets, a medical tendon repair device....just to name a few. There has been an enormous effort over the years of public relations through bouncing balls, trade shows, and open houses. There was the manufacturers rep route taken by Engle. There has been plethora of ideas publicly submitted on this board for Navy rail guns, NASA spaceships, auto parts, Space X, Tesla, and needless to say every single forth coming Apple product.

You mean to tell me that over the course of 20 years and all those sets of eyes that have looked at LQMT, not one of them can make profitable use of it?
No matter how expensive it may be; there is not anything anywhere that could benefit by LQMT (even at great cost)?
Not even a space program?
Not even a Formula One car?
None of the worlds militaries?
Not even crazy Elon Musk?

It all boils down to the fact that it doesn't work. All the engineers, metallurgical scientists, and industrialists know it does not work.

And when you take a look at the behavior time and time again by this company...yes LQMT too knows it doesn't work.