I didn't say NOT TO BUY it! Did you see ANYWHERE in my post, my saying DO NOT BUY IT?
My post had EVERYTHING to do with the;
[] lack of follow-through,
[] accountability & MOSTLY
[] EXECUTION!!
[] 14 BILLION shares
[] over ~14yrs
[] not a penny of profit!
[] Couldn't meet the filing requirement
[] to remain "Pink Current"
[] just last Quarter
[] Went EM again!
I have eight kids & both my wife & I drive luxury cars. If my kid kept getting into accidents, getting traffic tickets, was making poor uninformed choices, drinking socially, etc., & their car was banged up from ANOTHER ACCIDENT... and they asked to use mine, yours, or my wife's? Why would I do so? It would be irresponsible of me. You don't often in life get to FUCK UP & be given a larger engine, more horsepower, etc., until one exhibits some mastery.
Mark has to GROW THE FECK UP!
Having good, GREAT, even EXCEPTIONAL (GRRM, if you prefer) IP
And/or thousands of other elements to TOUT on the stock
Are hardly meaningful without the ability to leverage them.
It's like giving an inexperienced, new home cook the BEST INGREDIENTS in the world! Why?
Where is their
[] experience,
[] knowledge,
[] know-how,
[] track-record,
[] skills & ability
TO LEVERAGE the assets...?
A good, great or EXCEPTIONAL Chef (or CEO) can take modest ingredients & make them SING! & SHINE!
Whilst the opposite is NEVER TRUE!
Right now the ingredients don't matter...
Because Mark has NOT demonstrated his ability as a CHEF!
In fact, one might argue it is quiet the opposite... Even WHEN he had GREAT ingredients (like GRRM "GOT" IP) he shit the bed!
He didn't execute for shareholders. He did NOT bring home a profit! And isn't that how we evaluate the Chefs/CEO's in the capital
markets? By their revenues, profits, performance, market share, etc..?
Do you understand what I'm saying?
And I'm not saying he CAN'T DO IT... but he is NOT going to be a:
[] man of his word
[] with more shares
He's NOT going to be
[] following through on his obligations as CEO, filing on time, for example
[] with more shares
And so far he NEVER has!
An EXCEPTIONAL CEO focuses on Execution. Competence. Delivery! That has never been Mark. I haven't & nor do I follow the day-to-day but...
Mark has ALWAYS DEFAULTED on dilution. That's the equivalent of buying one's way out of bad choices, decisions & situations.
How about Mark focuses on making some money, with the ingredients he has on hand! And PROVE that any further issuances BEYOND what
he's currently carrying would be put in ready, PROVEN & very capable hands. If you were a shark on Shark Tank, instead of the shares (think of it as money), why would you give this guy more money? And BTW, before overthinking UNDERSTAND that the worse Mark is the MORE SHARES he's going to have to
offer for money. Why not use the ~2.8 BILLION he has at his disposal & prove he can ACUALLY DO SOMETHING!! Anything?
I challenge Mark!
I dare him!
Make a profit!
SHOW SHAREHOLDERS you can run a profitable OTC penny stock in this industry. So far he has not proven to be any sort of cook. So far he can SHOP for groceries & get what appears to be decent ingredients. What has he made with them though? A R/S SHIT-PIE for the shareholders he was loving up on & lavishing with praise during his last SHM?
You don't need Mark for that... Any OTC CEO will do. And yet Mark hasn't proven he can DO A DAMN THING with these ingredients! Having GRRM IP & 14 BILLION shares thus far actually MAKES the case that he has NO COMPETENCY as a CEO. Why waste the car, ingredients, etc..? Why subject these & presumably other shareholders to this incompetence (thus far, anyway)?
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
