Because it would be a fake contract and could create issues down the road that could potentially negate profits. Personally, I think forgery, for any reason, is not only “wrong,” it’s also illegal, and I don’t know why anyone would want to associate their business investments in an illegal arena.
If you’re referring to the Connie Nash forgery claims, I was told at the time that Halpern had a “wet” signature on file in the safe and that Connie Nash was not telling the truth. Nash denied this claim. Considering all the deception coming out of the principles involved, I have no way of knowing what was, in fact, the truth, and what was complete fiction from this group. I was never in favor the Google suits, but I certainly wouldn’t have been in favor of promoting a forged contract, which is why I asked the question after Nash posted her claims.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
