SA - Also lets not forget what appears to be at the top of the list. It seems the company also want's to separate BGEN/VIRO from ENZC & lawsuits as soon as they possibly can. Over the past few months there has bee a very noticeable change in how they release PR's (All used to be PR'd directly under ENZC, then the subs were discussed within that PR. Now, all PR's are being released under each individual sub, which I don't believe is a coincidence).
That is one thing I'm having trouble with. If they knew and planned on separating BGEN/VIRO from ENZC, then why tell us for 2+ years that they're working on audit, SEC Reporting, & uplist, then have ENZC license out the tech or partner with someone (BP) who has the funds they need, when they planned on separating/selling the tech from ENZC completely? Not to mention still no audit, still no SEC Reporting, no uplist?
Anyway, maybe I'm missing something, but it seems to me that for 2+ years we were being told one thing and/or led to believe one thing, all the while they were working/planning on doing something else.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
