Replies to post #159431 on Lightwave Logic Inc (LWLG)

[tedpeele]

Sigh. A grown-up discussion is about the message and not the messengers.

Re “alteady outlined” “100 times”— Not here. If identification of actively managed funds have been made on this board, it is most likely that Proto would’ve included it in one of his many cut and paste posts. I don’t recall ever seeing this.

This is an item that I and others challenged longs to come up with month after month. Lewrocks post yesterday was the first I’ve ever seen even suggesting they thought there were any, other than all of the already discredited claims that the holdings here by Vanguard and Blackrock are actively managed, and X mentioning the UMB bank long ago

This would appear to be yet another example of the arrogance of longs who when challenged simply attack the messenger and yell “liar” or “bot” or “twister” or obfuscator”or as you just have to Nrdc2 -“charlatan” - instead of providing evidence to support their view.

Again, a grown-up discussion is about the message and not the messengers

[Nrdc92]

None of this has been provided, Sparty. You, and many others, continually pedal poorly researched hyperbolic assertions - like actively managed funds own LWLG for growth - continually misleading. When you’re called out, you get defensive and obnoxious. It must be so hard to maintain your convictions as the share price sinks - 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4 ……..3?


Since you add nothing to the conversation other than reactionary vitriol and half-baked assertions, maybe it’s you who should bury yourself under the rock of ignorance for a bit, and surface when you have something verifiable and relevant to say.