InvestorsHub Logo

J Galt

10/06/23 5:24 PM

#39669 RE: grantastic #39643

I’ve had several shareholders ask me why I didn’t respond to this post and I realized I wrote it but apparently forgot to post it. Getting old.

Yes. My specialty is in research. It’s part of what I’ve done in business for over forty years, which has nothing to do with MAXD or the market by the way. I didn’t post that my “expertise” was in MAXD, I said “I’m considered to be an expert in that area,” meaning research. I have been a researcher in many fields including a research assistant in the legal field. I also did not say who made that consideration, but I would bet most board readers would admit I provide detail not typically found on this forum in my analyses of SEC filings, legal documents, Tenchi San, and Halpernette board posts. I’ve researched MAXD from top to bottom to make up for the fact that I did very little research before our investment dollars were committed as I was “listening” more than I was investigating and/or researching. Which was a mistake I’ve been paying for ever since. My bad.

I was not a “loyal supporter of his plan until he went bankrupt.” That’s factually inaccurate. Go back and look at all my board posts from the beginning and show me where I was a loyal supporter of Halpern. I openly came out against him when I learned the truth about Z-Trim and his past. When I learned what was really going on behind the scenes. When people stopped lying to me. That was years before the bankruptcy. I have posted the truth before, during, and after the bankruptcy. Facts matter. Not conjecture.

Here’s some additional facts that bear repeating, I have never met Harvey Vechery or Scott Kapp. I have never talked to them, emailed, texted, or communicated with them in any way. Constantly assuming I am in direct contact with them is not based on the facts. Stating that I am “spreading news” that Vechery has “changed his spots” is both inaccurate and assumptive on anyone’s part. I did not state anything about “changing spots” in my post. However, Greg Halpern ran the company and made all the decisions. Harvey Vechery was the bank providing money for Halpern, both personally and for MAXD. From what I have learned, Harvey did not design or participate in the marketing plans, develop the promotions, write the PRs, or pump the stock. He bought out the toxic debt and invested in the company. He has not sold his stock; therefore, he did not benefit from Halpern’s manipulations, nor was he part of the “pump and dump” schemes Halpern developed. Like so many other people in this melodrama, he listened to Halpern and believed what he was hearing. A man of his means should have employees in his company who can do the research for him to prevent him from getting involved with a man like Greg Halpern.

Where did I mention “secret patents” and “secret contracts?” The patents were all public and the information is available to anyone who wants to do the research. There is only one patent left active and that is on the MAXD Biometric Audio Security. What contracts are you talking about? There are no current contracts that I’m aware of as the company is not doing any business. Lumping me in with the Halpernettes, who constantly promoted one fake “big deal” after another, is inaccurate as I had nothing to do with promoting the stock.

Not signing and submitting SEC forms at this stage hardly classifies Vechery as a “scammer.” There are legal reasons for what is happening, as well as what is not happening. We will all be able to read the PR or shareholder letter when it is released, and I’m as anxious as everyone else for that to happen. However, since Halpern famously moved the company to “non-reporting” status with the SEC, and then intentionally took MAXD to the Expert Market, before being removed from the company, where is the urgency to file with the SEC? MAXD is already out of compliance with the SEC on filings and there is virtually no trading going on thanks to the EM status. Therefore, anything Harvey Vechery does or doesn’t do publicly is not impacting the share price right now. Furthermore, the SEC has been made aware of Greg Halpern’s actions and has done nothing. I doubt Vechery’s legal team is worried about the SEC right now. For that matter, it’s more than likely going to be difficult to get the company reinstated to the OTC based on all the information the SEC has on file.

Harvey Vechery had the “best interests of the shareholders at heart” when he challenged Halpern in court and had him removed from the company. He is the second largest shareholder in the company and holder of the notes. Which means he also has his own best interests at heart. Greg Halpern has been scamming shareholders for years and it was in the best interest of everyone associated with MAXD that he be removed. Harvey Vechery has lost many millions of dollars in his investment in MAXD and has earned nothing from this relationship. Those are provable facts.

One other point, converting stock does not mean that Vechery liquidated stock. People often equate the two. Other than one minor stock sale of approximately $256, Harvey Vechery has never liquidated stock, as has been implied on this board. He stands to lose more than anyone involved in this fiasco as he has the most invested. That includes Greg Halpern who continues to claim to be the largest shareholder investing millions of “cash” dollars into the company. Right.