Renee- Shareholders note that bashers are bullies. You have stridently supported them as like minded do it the bashers way. You also share their inexperience in real world experience . Also shared is name calling and zealotry.
Portfolio and long shareholders do their own due diligence. They support or not based on their own criteria.
Your statements and references are only those that operate like a pack with no individual freedom and power of legal process and evidence. It takes leadership to step away from the crowd based on fact and tenaciously move forward one step at a time. The difference is dealing at the BOD level, not overreaching intermediary like the DOE who did not even understand the mitigating circumstances. The ALJ understood and applied judicial discretion. As did a FINRA as did OTCM as did the SEC in its Final Order.
No experience in running a company is a detriment. No Company revoked would ever be supported for organic growth and/or acquisitions. No Company accepting revocation when knowing otherwise —that there were mitigating circumstances— would ever get proper investors.
Suggest you stay in your lane and not attempt to tell shareholders what they should do. They are successful adults with varying personal criteria. You were very wrong and influencing to them to suit your short selling world is nothing but manipulation. Zealotry and manipulation have no place here.
Your Nov 2022 post was totally out of order. It was an over-zealous attempt using negative manipulation to tell shareholders to
contact the Company CEO and Litigation Counsel to effect an action which would have damaged shareholders considerably . That outlandish advice for action would have had no harm to you as like most bashers, are non-shareholders.
Zealots are conspiracy theorists who rarely have skin in the game. They are shills for bad actors, or bad actors themselves.