I don't see that omission as a glaring fault like I regarded, in last winter's press releases, the omissions of comparison of the means for ADCS-ADL and the n for the odds ratios. I wanted the percent-less-decline information, though, and I don't see the advantage of writing press releases that don't reveal things I expect a typical serious investor would want to know when it's something that is commonly included. (Schmiggins maybe a month ago argued that Anavex wrote less informative press releases in order to keep people guessing and to keep the share price low -- that I thought was absurd.) I'm not particularly troubled by this omission, however. I'm pleased with much of the press release, but I do believe it could have been better and could have had a better impact -- not just today, but ongoing until the next major news drop -- on the share price.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
