Yeah right. "The meaning was quite clear". To begin with the jumbled "sentence" was a cliched thought. Then the poor reader sees it goes nowhere! The statistical razzamatazz that is the meat of the release is on its face demanding of careful reading. The average reader of it is thinking, "Well, I guess that all made some kind of sense and is legit." Then he reads that ridiculous nonsense sentence from the new guy who's so great at articulation supposedly. And it's a stupid non-thought non-sentence. Thus the reader must begin to suspect, "the whole enterprise of this release must be fraudulent sloppy crap just like that "normal" "human" sentence was." And then the reader thinks, "Wow! No one even proofread this release! What kind of silly company IS this?!" And so the statistical mumbo-jumbo has now effectively been jettisoned as more nonsense - which is how it reads to 99% of people to begin with!
Sorry, Bas, but that's how it works with rational people looking at this company. The science may be fine, but you will not get any help on that from this press release or from this sloppy company. That's how it reads. If you're fine with that lousiness that's fine. The wider (investment) world is not.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
