Replies to post #715709 on Mr Cooper Group Inc (COOP)

[wowalters]

Is Dr A's $86B considered to be an " Over the Top Number " ?...

[BBANBOB]

AZ

AS I have said now for a long time and have been telling JWW and others this

""that can't do shhheeeeeet' with ZOME without permission from (XXXX)"""

See we agree YET AGAIN ...GOOD TO SEE even you finally picked up on it

Ya always seem to eventually come around with ""YOUR"" NEW LIGHT BULB MOMENTS that have already been discussed for months on end, FUNNY HOW THAT HAPPENS AINT IT

[serafino1]

And here is a new posting from AZCOWBOY that is clear, correct and understandable even to me,
Thank you very much
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*Group of 6*
__________________________
It's really sad and upsetting, I thought our favourite little group here in the room would never stoop to a discussion with a mole and a clowns in the room, unfortunately the little group of 6 hard-working people, we are considering de strinfrlo to only 4 members.
In a free room, you can, if you want to talk only with serious people and not with people who have an agenda, or suffer greatly from NARCISISM.
It is very annoying, I wonder, that the management of IHUB does not react
Summa Summarum, this is just a waste of time, time is more precious than gold, it is equal to the air we have to breathe, without both it is lethal.
However, we are free to act as each one wishes.

[ckaufman2160]

AZ, Two questions if I may?

1) How do you know what the parameter is regarding possible common esc. payouts?
2) Where does one (you) gain the knowledge of what is in the works?

Tia

CK/aka Herb Smith

[boarddork]

I do like footnote 2, on page 2 of this KCCLLC filing. How they hid the sausage from court and creditors. https://www.deb.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/opinions/judge-mary-f.walrath/wamu-v.oregon-otc-f12-19-12.pdf Dec. 19, 2012


"The REITS themselves, however, were not members of the [WMI] Consolidated Tax Group and were not included in the consolidated federal returns. During the same period, WMI filed consolidated returns on behalf of the Consolidated Tax Group in Oregon as well. The REITS were not included in the consolidated Oregon returns. Thus, the income of the REITS from the REIT loans was not reflected in the consolidated federal or Oregon tax returns."


Background: same doc, page 1 "In late 1999, each of the REITS became directly-owned subsidiaries of a holding company of WMI and changed their
commercial domiciles from the State of Washington to Oregon."