To continue...
1st, your mention of caps, etc is pedantic. Get over it. You running a bit thin there esp in contrast to my fact filled in depth posts. You should quit while you think you're ahead but you spellbound and have no control over negativity while processing positivity......so I'll try to be understanding.
To finish my point about the abilities needed to truly decipher the patents, which you obviously don't have....
I've pointed out many times that according to the great Emu, he raised and spent some $18 million on some 20-25 voip telephony engineer and code writers to create the patents. Here's some more caps for you as I know how they hurt your delicate ears (hint: they're only letters on a screen, lol, get a grip), THAT RIGHT THERE TELLS ME VERY VERY CLEARLY........THAT IF IT TOOK THST MUCH MONEY AND THAT NUMBER OF VOIP ENGINEERS, AIN'T NO WAY IN HELL THAT YOU, ME, YOUR FRIEND (in all likelihood), AND ANYONE ELSE ON THIS BOARD IS EQUAL AND UP TO THE TASK OF FULLY DECIPHERING THESE PATENTS. ANNNNNNNND...........EVEN IF THEY (are your ears hurting, ok here ya go..) were, that still is not enough to determine efficacy, workability, compatibility, annnnnnnnnnnd....................then also do the same to ea and every source code of the ea and every feature offered by the defendants which allegedly infringe. So now you can go right ahead and call that well covered assessment by me, word salad and/or whatever else you might come up with, but what it actually is, is knowledge and a covering of the bases in a most thorough way. Sorry, you can't handle the truth...
I'll give you extra time now before I cover the rest of your post, to absorb. It's fat soluble, so not as easily absorbed. One last thing in this post.....try to keep in mind that I have not said the patents are undeniably bogus. I'm not remotely qualified. But believe that time will reveal it to be so and I believe that via INFERENCE of other facts that I DO know about.