No that's dumb. How many times must it be explained to you that it doesn't mean anything if they "won" a million IPRs? A favorable IPR outcomes simply and ONLY fends off challengers trying to put an end to vplm's lawsuits. It DOES NOT CHANGE ANYTHING REPEAT DOES NOT CHANGE A THING! When the IPR trial is over it's still the same patents WITH THE EXACT SAME VALIDITY THEY HAD THE DAY THEY WERE ALLOWED AS PATENTS BY THE USPTO! NO MORE NO LESS. NOTHING HAS BEEN ADDED TO THE PATENTS TO MAKE THEM STRONGER OR BETTER. NO CHANGE!
ITS QUITE AMUSING HOW BACK IN THE DAY WHILE THE PATENT PROCECUTIONS WERE ONGOING.....ALL THE PEEPS HERE THAT KEPT HARANGUING ANY DETRACTORS ABOUT HOW HARD WORKING, THOROUGH AND KNOWLEDGEABLE THE USPTO WORKERS WERE AND HOW THEY DIDNT MISS A TRICK. THEY HAD TO STUDY AND APPROVE EA AND EVERY ATTRIBUTE THE PATENTS CLAIMED TO HAVE AND LEAVE NO STONE UNTURNED. AND YET........NOW.....EVERY TIME A CHALLENGE IS DENIED, YOU AND A BUNCH OF OTHERS THINK THAT ADDS SOMETHING MORE THAT WASNT THERE FROM THE GITGO.
IT DOES NOT.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
