InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

BBANBOB

09/04/23 1:24 PM

#715263 RE: Royal Dude #715262

RD

I am curious do YOU STILL BELIEVE that those NOT HARMED and that were NOT PART of the settlement agreement will benefit s well well ?
Like post 3/19/2012 that did not elect toparticipate !

THis is like I had a home it burnt down someone bought my lot BUT NOW WANTS THE INSURANCE MONEY for my home.

SOOOOOOOO rry pard this makes zero sense 2.5% of returns OK but not the BULK OF THE ESTATE as that makes no sense
icon url

novascotiaSTS

09/04/23 4:48 PM

#715266 RE: Royal Dude #715262

This is actually in relation to Vue Entertainment International Limited, which is why they put Vue Entertainment International Limited in the Subject line of the document and which is why they printed Vue Entertainment International Limited in bold at the top of the text.

But maybe that was not obvious for a “retired College Finance professor“?
icon url

PickStocks

09/04/23 5:59 PM

#715273 RE: Royal Dude #715262

Quote: ..”Anico case sealed to give Bucket 1 Sussman group a sealed case = 32B + x 2

Settlement between EC/JPM/FDIC not rico but 2x

75%/25% 2.5 Bil to WMIH/COOP “

Suckman to our rescue….