InvestorsHub Logo

boston745

08/23/23 11:09 AM

#80834 RE: Tesla thru the roof #80831

No it's not. All evidence based fact, except Musk is a stooge part, thats an opinion based on fact. Dr Griffin is the wizard behind the man. It is fact that Musk began Spacex without knowing a damn thing about rocket science. That his underlings and Griffin had to teach him what he needed to know.

Elon Musk is a stooge, a front, a puppet for Dr. Griffin and the DoD.

According to Bloomberg, Musk really began SpaceX June 2002 even though it was registered as a company on March 14th 2002.

According to Musk’s calculations, he could undercut existing launch companies by building a modest-size rocket that specialized in carrying smaller satellites and research payloads to space. In June 2002 he founded Space Exploration Technologies, or SpaceX. He was on his way to Mars.


https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2015-elon-musk-spacex/

Simultaneously, the US officially withdrew from the AMB treaty, June 13th, 2002.

Ceased to be in force on 13 June 2002, after the US formally withdrew from the Treaty


The following quote indicates why the US needed to leave the AMB treaty for the deployment of Brilliant Pebbles.
So its interesting "coincidence" that SpaceX wasn't really started until the US officially left the treaty. Indicating that this same treaty hampered SpaceX as well.

The Treaty and the ensuing Agreed Statements specified in detail the number and characteristics of radars permitted by the Treaty. The Treaty prohibited development, testing, or deployment of sea-based, air-based, space-based, or mobile land-based ABM systems or components (Article V).


https://www.nti.org/education-center/treaties-and-regimes/treaty-limitation-anti-ballistic-missile-systems-abm-treaty/


Researchers highlighted fears that Starlink satellites could be used as maneuverable weapons to strike targets in orbit, or to surveil the space environment. It bears noting that Starlink was primarily developed as a civilian communications system, though it does have significant military applications like most communications systems do.


China certainly seems to think, as I do, that Starlink, or really starshield, can be used as an ABM system. Add those laser systems the US is having tested and sure enough it is.
In fact I think SpaceX was founded specifically with that in mind under the guise of going to Mars. As ive shown with indirect evidence, Dr Griffin (a DoD & SpaceX consultant) was the real brains behind SpaceX and Musk.
https://hackaday.com/2023/06/22/china-plans-its-own-megaconstellation-to-challenge-starlink/

Since its invasion of Ukraine, Russia has threatened to target western commercial satellites it considers to be involved in the war. Shortly after the invasion began, Elon Musk agreed to supply Starlink constellation satellites to Ukraine, which rapidly became crucial to the country’s military. But in February, Starlink said it would prevent the satellites from being used to control Ukrainian drones, saying it never intended the technology to be used for “offensive purposes”.

Morehouse said one of the lessons from the conflict was how resilient Starlink proved to be. The communications network comprises thousands of small satellites in low Earth orbit which are easily replaced and updated to counter the threats they face. “It makes no sense for Russia to even try to shoot one down because there’s thousands of them and they don’t have thousands of anti-satellite missiles,” he said.


https://www.theguardian.com/science/2023/may/28/us-ready-to-fight-in-space-military-official

Brilliant Pebbles: The Revolutionary Idea for Strategic Defense

https://www.heritage.org/defense/report/brilliant-pebbles-the-revolutionary-idea-strategic-defense

January 8, 2019—Brilliant Pebbles Is Affordable!

http://highfrontier.org/january-8-2019-brilliant-pebbles-is-affordable/

Scumbag Fraudsters

08/23/23 8:21 PM

#80850 RE: Tesla thru the roof #80831

Keep arguing with him - you'll win someday. 😈