Replies to post #764159 on Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[Patswil]

With the FHFA requesting a deferral of the judgment through an oral motion (concealment of the reasoning behind the request), it said it all for someone that cares to find out the reasoning behind, and the allies FHFA-Hedge funds fell into their own trap of jury trial.
This is why the plotters now attempt to pass the jury's verdict off as a judge's judgment (court order about the jury's decision), praising the jury's verdict on national TV as we saw yesterday with the hedge fund manager Pagliara, when a verdict is a simple statement that can't be appealed or enforced, as it doesn't take effect until there is a judgment. Besides, Judge Lamberth could enter a judgment in favor of the losing party, arguing, for instance, that the jury incorrectly applied the law in reaching its verdict, as it's well known that they requested the HERA text and the laws in force are the FHEFSSA and the Charter Act.
They don't want to find out why the judgment has been deferred sine die.

[bradford86]

You and wiseman misread this, thinking that the law applies when no court is enforcing the concept of equity dividends being illegal when the companies are undercapitalized in conservatorship

This whole conservatorship has been a breach of law and trust and fraud pulled over the courts and public and shareholders. I do not think any legal action has challenged the cash dividend payments to the spspa 2008-2019.

Good luck with your subsequently broken analysis