InvestorsHub Logo

bb8675309

08/18/23 6:58 AM

#427725 RE: Investor2014 #427724

So, who made you in charge of the rules.?

kevindenver

08/18/23 9:14 AM

#427737 RE: Investor2014 #427724

There are multiple components that have influence upon a company's share price. $AVXL's share price is also subject to valuations granted similar companies within the same sector for example the $XBI.

IMO, the only factor than can break $AVXL from the "current challenging risk adverse market" is validation of it's claims by 3rd parties (i.e. peer reviewed publication) and/or presentation of such with "standard measures" as apparently the "odds ratio" is not impressive enough to warrant a break away from the doldrums of the sector.

The $XBI and $AVXL are again WEAK and seeking price stability most likely at a support level at ~ $75 and $7.50 respectively.
Bullish
Bullish

bas2020

08/18/23 9:45 AM

#427740 RE: Investor2014 #427724

Hilarious...

The share price is entirely explained by the continued inconsistency between the claims made by Anavex and the lack of data and actions to support them in context of the current challenging risk adverse market.


So, you're trying to convince the board that the market was excited about the prospects of Anavex a week ago and started buying up the stock to 9.85, then when AF releases his timely hit piece, the market changes its mind, "believing AF", and then begins selling. Do you really think investors are that stupid?

It's collusive manipulation pure and simple... evidenced by AF's timely hit piece to initiate another orchestrated selloff and short attack, after they pumped up the price. It's all too obvious and has been their game for years.

Yet paid FUDsters try to sell a "fair market", "blame the CEO", narrative to cover up the crimes.