It has been abundantly clear that you and the basher cabal have no understanding or knowledge of the digital arena,
Ridiculous. Also stupid.
Why did the "dot.com" bubble burst? Because companies were ridiculously OVER VALUED, based on NOTHING. No cash flow, no profit...no nothing. When that became clear, people dumped dot.com companies left and right, which cratered the entire economy.
The only reason YOU are promoting that type of situation is because DBMM has VERY LITTLE business, NO cash flow and NO profit. Yet you want people to believe that DBMM is worth something (or WILL be worth something).
It isn't and unless things change in the way it is being run, it won't BE.
Really stupid to talk about borrowing as "cash flow financing", as if it some "badge of honor". It isn't. The very term signifies a failing company. Borrowing cash because the company doesn't make enough money to keep operating is STILL BORROWING. The phrase "Our LTI's have provided cash flow financing for the past X number of years" translates into "For the last X years, the company has had insufficient revenues to survive, without borrowing money from lenders".
And you seem to say this with great pride. That is stupid and inane.
I would think that after 20 YEARS of the same operational failure, shareholders would vote you OUT of the CEO position and kick your butt out the door.