InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Lurker3

08/04/23 4:30 PM

#150442 RE: tedpeele #150440

Ted I can understand partly what you are saying.
My investment philosophy 1/3 direct hard asset investment, 1/3 in long term passive investments such as, berkshire, shell etc with a steady yearly growth on average and some dividends.
1/3 in speculative companies such as lwlg. Yes you can loose all the money invested in lwlg, thats all in the game. But if one or 2 companies i invested in makes it that will cover the losses.

Lwlg is in reality still a company that can go bankrupt for numerous reasons. But it also holds a certain potential. If it works out awesome but i am well aware that it might wont do it. Then I loose my investment. Its all in the game.

Trying to question and to ask for clearity from the bod is not worth it. They are not obliged to. We can only sit on the sideline and once a year we have the right to vote them away or not if we feel like they misrepresent the shareholders interest.
And if you want something to change within the company well buy a stake of 15% and you will have major influence.
icon url

chsmoke

08/04/23 5:45 PM

#150444 RE: tedpeele #150440

yes tedpeele. unfortunately, yes. possibly dismally, yes.
except for posters posting prattle, another silent week. another week of silence.
it's lucky you all have each other. minimal and strange though they are, they are relationships.
bonds of mutuality and agreed upon perspective, bonds of insult, disagreement, and acrimony,
all forged out of the occasional mixed messages and seemingly endless company silences.
next week? heaven forfend--more of the same...
at least have a good weekend everybody!
icon url

x993231

08/04/23 7:53 PM

#150445 RE: tedpeele #150440

What I see is that as soon as the shorts stop, up it goes.

X. 22,000,000 shares borrowed and not returned. Don't worry too much it's not like there are a bunch of Partnerships being negotiated, yawn.

X