Hi Deano. fwiw, I'm not sure they are "blood relatives." That might be why he's saying they are not related. My guess is that he's connected through a marriage of a family member, cousin, aunt, something not direct.
I have several cousins, aunts, uncles too, not blood, but through marriage. I don't know some of them, don't socialize with them, don't live near them. But if I were to loan them money, or invest in their publicly traded company, I'd know them.
But unfortunately, the public record shows connections in last names and addresses that are beyond coincidence. Of course public record can be wrong, or misleading too. But the smoking gun, imo, is that FUNR directly names Zach as Alex's "nephew." If that's not true, they should retract. Maybe they have, I haven't read or purchased their court documents from July 11.
Related, not related. What matters to me is what happens to those shares now, and my perception of Ethan's lack of communication. IMO. hL
PS Edit: Don't misunderstand, Zach could be a good guy, I don't know him like you guys evidently do. If he is that's great, I'm just trying to sort out the connection of the players in this soap opera, imo, and how it translates to a FUNR future.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
