Replies to post #15644 on NanoLogix Inc (NNLX)

[exploremore]

"How you stand by and allow Bret to continue to destroy any value left in the technologies and disregard the shareholders is confusing to me."
The way I explain it is they have discovered there is no marketable value in any of their technologies. Bret has never shown the capacity to understand his role as CEO of a publicly traded company.

I applaud your effort to hold Bret accountable for his failures but I doubt there is any benefit to anyone,

[Jon Jon]

Ant says "so we can reorganize and set the company back on track it is my/our intention to work for you to build significant shareholder value"

First of all, the CEO owns the company, you are not going to be able to legally dislodge it from him. You might get the name or symbol but that's it.
Second, even if you ever got control of the company I don't see you building any sig shareholder value as it only has the flat packs. Bret and Faro own the N-assay and RVA patents and IMO there's no way they would give those up... just sayin
You must have some deep pockets, pun intended, to be able to afford all these legal maneuvers you are talking about, and for what, a company that has nothing significant to offer? IMO this is still some kind of personal vendetta on your part. I would think there are other better opportunities elsewhere for you put your time, effort, and money into.
By the way, who is "we" and "us"?

[Omar8]

Ant4,



"Unfortunately as you are being named in a complaint being filed in Delaware I have been advised not to communicate with you other than to inquire if you would be interested in an all cash offer for any interest you may own in the patents. To be clear we have no interest in having any communications or dealings with Bret. "

Just curious, how much of an all cash offer would it be ?