Can only add that the consensus seems to be this is a huge win for Trump's team.
Well, I for one (and I am sure many others may agree) that this was a huge win for Justice in America. Let us not forget, as previosly shown in my previous post, the Judge asked point blank, if the lawyers had ever seen a precedent for the sweeping inclusions within that very immunity stipulation. The answer, of course, was no. And don't forget, this agreement was negotiated and hashed out after months of negotiation. After all that, it is hard for me to believe that there could have been any misunderstanding between the prosecution and defense teams. One more question lends light to how nefarious this immunity was. Why was it buried into the gun diversion portion of the agreement? Experts said the deal does indeed bear some uncommon features, particularly in the way prosecutors structured Biden's immunity from future charges. Prosecutors included details about Hunter Biden's foreign business endeavors into the plea deal on the misdemeanor tax charges, but wrote the immunity standards into the diversion agreement -- the much-cited Paragraph 15 -- which would include "any federal crimes encompassed" in the statement of facts for the plea agreement.
Lucian Dervan, a law professor at Belmont University, said the judge seemed concerned that the decision to handle immunity in the diversion program rather than in the plea agreement "might have removed that issue from her purview." https://abcnews.go.com/US/hunter-biden-plea-agreement/story?id=101718321 Are we to believe that these lawyers are so incompetent as to leave any misunderstandings open and to be revealed in open court? Or is it more likely that this whole agreement was crafted jointly to keep the American public unaware of how involved the Biden's were involved in Bribery schemes and influence peddling? Joe Biden asked a reporter "So where's all the money" Perhaps it is in alleged overseas bank accounts. Why would the Biden's need all those shell companies and overseas bank accounts. According to financial records obtained by the Oversight Committee, the Biden family set up over 20 shell companies, most of which were created when Joe Biden was vice president. IRS whistleblowers have confirmed the existence of these companies. Bank records obtained so far by the Oversight Committee show the Biden family, their business associates, and their companies received over $10 million from foreign nationals’ and their related companies. The Bidens engaged in many intentionally complicated financial transactions through their associates to hide these payments and avoid scrutiny. https://oversight.house.gov/release/hearing-wrap-up-irs-whistleblowers-expose-how-bidens-were-treated-differently%ef%bf%bc/
"Would you be willing to hand over the paperwork with respect to foreign transactions?" Comer recounted as his last question to the whistleblowers on Wednesday, then telling Hannity, "It’s been almost impossible for my committee to subpoena bank records from foreign countries. The IRS has that, and they are willing to turn that over to the Ways and Means Committee, who will hand it over to us." "That’s a big deal because we suspect that the Bidens had offshore bank accounts and that today was a huge development that will open up a new door for us to move forward in our investigation," the Kentucky Republican added, saying he believes there’s "easily" $25 to 30 million or more tied to the Biden family in foreign business dealings. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/hunter-biden-investigation-comer-says-irs-whistleblowers-willing-to-hand-over-foreign-transactions-paperwork/ar-AA1e6zDZ
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
